USPTO serial 74117364
ABTOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICARDO, RANDY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ABTOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pleasanton, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL M. KAUFMAN
DANIEL M KAUFMAN BROBECK, PHLEGER & HARRISON2200 GENG RD2 EMBARCADERO PLPALO ALTO, CA 94303Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | gas plasma dry sterilizing apparatus, replacement parts therefor, and supplies therefor comprising gas mixtures and packaging materials for use with plasma dry sterilizing systems | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1993 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Apr 23, 1993 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 11, 1993 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 23, 1992 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 1992 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |