USPTO serial 74118392
FANTASME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VLCEK, TOMAS V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FANTASME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil F. Greenblum
NEIL F GREENBLUM SANDLER & GREENBLUM2920 S GLEBE RDARLINGTON, VA 22206UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfumery products, namely perfumes, toilet water; beauty products, namely rouge, eye shadow, base make-up, face and beauty masks, lip-sticks, nail polishes baths, toilet soaps; essential oils for personal use; hair lotions, shaving soaps, creams and foams; after-shave lotions and balms; toothpastes; tanning products, namely solar oils, milks, lotions and creams, self-tanning creams, skin-tanning lotions; non-medical preparations for skin and face care, namely non-medical vitalizing and toning lotions and creams, moisturizing lotions and creams, granulated creams, deodorants for personal use | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 1992 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 1991 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |