USPTO serial 74118611
SOVIET-AMERICAN JOINT VENTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOVIET-AMERICAN JOINT VENTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH R. MARCUS, ESQ.
JOSEPH R MARCUS ESQ WELSH & KATZ135 S LASALLE STSTE 1625CHICAGO, IL 60603-4302Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | computer programs used as games | ABANDONED | Jun 27, 1990 |
| 035 | manufacturers representative in the field of computer hardware and software products | ABANDONED | Jun 27, 1990 |
| 041 | conducting of training in use of computer hardware and software | ABANDONED | Jun 27, 1990 |
| 042 | distributorship services in the field of computer hardware and software | ABANDONED | Jun 27, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JV Dialogue
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SOVIET-AMERICAN JOINT VENTURE
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 26, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 1991 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |