USPTO serial 74120917
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ian Jay Kaufman
IAN JAY KAUFMAN LADAS & PARRY26 W 61ST STNEW YORK, NY 10023UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | watches, parts and fitting therefor | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1994 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |