USPTO serial 74122290
INTRANS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTRANS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ralf H. Siegemund
RALF H SIEGEMUND BEEHLER & PAVITT3435 WILSHIRE BLVDSTE 1100LOS ANGELES, CA 90010-1978Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electro-technical and electronic equipment particularly for electrotechnical, thermotechnical chemo-technical and petrochemical processes; namely, measuring transducers for acquiring measuring values; electrical, optic-electronic, physical and physical-chemical operating signal transducers, measuring transducers and data transducers; measuring equipment; namely, measuring transducers; measuring, control, indicating, monitoring instruments, for use with technical process equipment; devices for remote transmission and data exchange; transducers for outputing signals; namely, printers and electronic displays; computers and peripherals therefor; analyzing equipment; namely, automatically operating gas and liquid analyzers; optical operating analyzers with light modulation; in-line measuring equipment; as well as parts thereof | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |