USPTO serial 74125694
CONFERMAIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THAYER, GARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONFERMAIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Dorr
ROBERT C DORR DORR, CARSON, SLOAN & PETERSONTHE PATENT LAW BLDG3010 E 6TH AVEDENVER, CO 80206Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | communication services; namely, to store and forward an audio teleconference | ABANDONED | Jun 14, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 1, 1995 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 1, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 10, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 22, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 25, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 1993 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 23, 1993 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 1992 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 30, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 14, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |