USPTO serial 74126184
THE CAT CAME BACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE CAT CAME BACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | pre-recorded video cassettes and motion picture films featuring entertainment, musical soundtrack recordings, bicycle reflectors and safety vests | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | electric nightlights, flashlights and bicycle lights | ABANDONED | — |
| 014 | ornamental lapel pins | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | story boards, calendars, posters, coloring books, story books, gift wrapping paper, greeting cards, sticker books and sticker boards; paint sets for children | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | tote bags, purses, knapsacks and wallets | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | decorative light switchcovers, ornamental novelty badges and ornamental lapel buttons | ABANDONED | — |
| 024 | towels | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | clothing; namely, T-shirts, sweatshirts, pajamas, caps, headbands and bathrobes | ABANDONED | — |
| 026 | belt buckles not of precious metal | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | dolls, board games, musical toys consisting of childrens storybooks and electronic music synthesizers, toy piggy banks and jigsaw puzzles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OAK STREET MUSIC INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OAK STREET MUSIC INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named THE CAT CAME BACK
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 1994 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 9, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 2, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1992 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 1992 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |