USPTO serial 74126507
TOM TOMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BATTLE, KENNETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOM TOMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Norwich, Norfolk NR9 5QD, GB
Norwich, Norfolk NR9 5QD, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William P. Berridge
WILLIAM P BERRIDGE OLIFF & BERRIDGE700 S WASHINGTON STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | poultry; processed poultry; meat, processed meat; fish; processed fish; shellfish; processed shellfish; seafood; processed seafood; and prepared meals consisting primarily of poultry, meat, fish, shellfish or seafood | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 2, 1993 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 1993 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 23, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 9, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 11, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 20, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |