Drawing for CINNFULLY DELICIOUS

USPTO serial 74126955

CINNFULLY DELICIOUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RUPP, TERRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CINNFULLY DELICIOUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Herbert L. Bello

HERBERT L BELLO40 GROVE STWELLESLEY, MA 02181UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030pastry, rolls and muffinsABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 14, 1993ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Dec 14, 1993EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Apr 27, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Apr 13, 1993CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Mar 26, 1993JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 26, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 11, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 13, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 20, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Nov 4, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 27, 1991UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
May 1, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 5, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance