USPTO serial 74127603
21ST CENTURY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUTHEY, LYNN A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 21ST CENTURY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta Jacobs-Meadway
1601 MARKET ST 36TH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | organizing and administering pre-paid health care plans | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1994 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 1994 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1994 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 1994 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 1993 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 10, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 8, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 15, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 7, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |