USPTO serial 74127652
AIRCYCLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSENBURGH, ELISSA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIRCYCLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard C. Harris
RICHARD C HARRIS STEVENS, DAVIS, MILLER & MOSHER515 N WASHINGTON STP O BOX 1427ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | prerecorded video tapes featuring and explanation of architectural and air-conditioning engineering, motion picture film featuring an explanation of architectural and air-conditioning engineering, exposed slide film | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | air conditioners for commercial use, air dampers for commercial use, solar collectors for heating, ventilation (air-conditioning) units | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | books, catalogs, brochures, magazines (periodicals), newspapers, newsletters, journals, manuals (handbooks), pamphlets, prospectuses, all featuring architectural and air-conditioning engineering | ABANDONED | — |
| 019 | framework for buildings not of metal, laths not of metal, paperboards for buildings, wooden planks for buildings, plywood, manufactured timber, veneer wood, veneers, wainscotting not of metal, wood panelling, semi-worked wood, wood-pulp board for buildings, polyurethane boards | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AIRCYCLE SANGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by AIRCYCLE SANGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named AIRCYCLE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 8, 1994 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 1994 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 23, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 27, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |