USPTO serial 74127822
SHERLOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLUE, RACHEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHERLOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Marquage Antivol Sherlock Inc./Sherlock Inc. Antitheft Marking
Longueuil, Quebec, J4K 3R2, CA
Other trademarks owned by Marquage Antivol Sherlock Inc./Sherlock Inc. Antitheft Marking
Marquage Antivol Sherlock Inc./Sherlock Inc. Antitheft Marking
Longueuil, Quebec, J4K 3R2, CA
Other trademarks owned by Marquage Antivol Sherlock Inc./Sherlock Inc. Antitheft Marking
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta S. Bren
ROBERTA S BREN OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER, ET AL1755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | etching and identification of objects to prevent theft | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Marquage Antivol Sherlock Inc./Sherlock Inc. Antitheft Marking
- Other trademarks owned by Marquage Antivol Sherlock Inc./Sherlock Inc. Antitheft Marking
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named SHERLOCK
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 1994 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 1994 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 9, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 11, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |