USPTO serial 74128855
CALLAWAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CALLAWAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM W HAEFLIGER
WILLIAM W HAEFLIGER CHRISTOPHER P BUSSERTKILPATRICK & CODY1100 PEACHTREE ST STE 2800ATLANTA, GA 30309-4530Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | sports clothing; namely, shirts, sweatshirts, visors and golf hats | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 12, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 8, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 22, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |