USPTO serial 74129392
WILD THINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WILD THINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
East Hanover, NJ
East Hanover, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven H. Hartman
STEVEN H HARTMAN LAW DEPTNABISCO BRANDS, INCP O BOX 311PARSIPPANY, NJ 07054-0311Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | cookies and crackers | ABANDONED | Mar 27, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 1996 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 7, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 16, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 23, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 18, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |