USPTO serial 74129917
MEMPRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, LAURA E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEMPRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E. Heslin
ROBERT E HESLIN HESLIN & ROTHENBERG, PC5 COLUMBIA CIRALBANY, NY 12203-5160UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | membrane modules for gas enrichers such as devices to partially separate the components of air used in general industrial, business or construction | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | permeable membranes for medical use; namely, blood-gas analysis and gas sensor detection and membrane modules for patient oxygen enrichers | ABANDONED | Jul 15, 1991 |
| 011 | permeable membranes for use in the manufacture of chemicals, food processing and food testing and in industrial diagnostics | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Oxygen Enrichment Company, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Oxygen Enrichment Company, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named MEMPRO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 1995 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Feb 25, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 26, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 26, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 27, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |