USPTO serial 74130121
GEOWALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, BRIDGET A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GEOWALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CH 6390 Engelberg, CH
CH 6390 Engelberg, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adrienne L. White
ADRIENNE L WHITE BURNS, DOANE, SWECKER & MATHISP O BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | precast concrete elements for use as retaining walls and the like, and fabrics for anchoring same | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 3, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 5, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 5, 1993 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 21, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 28, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 1991 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |