Drawing for GEM+

USPTO serial 74130570

GEM+

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSENBURGH, ELISSA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GEM+?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Walter C. Farley

STEPHEN M KNAUER GEMPLUS3 LAGOON DR STE 300REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer programs for use with cards having electronic circuit chips or computer chips for data processing; devices for reading of and inputting binary data to cards with electronic circuit chips and computer chipsABANDONED—
042computer programming, design of computer software relating to cards with electronic circuit chips and computer chipsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 1993ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 13, 1993NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 11, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 10, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 20, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 18, 1992CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 7, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance