Drawing for EVENT STAFF

USPTO serial 74131055

EVENT STAFF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVENT STAFF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott A. Ferris, P.A.

SCOTT A FERRIS, PA10720 CARIBBEAN BLVDSTE 230MIAMI, FL 33189

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042patron services, i.e. security, crowd control, ticket takers and ushers, at various sporting and entertainment events or productions held at arenas, convention centers, stadiums, speedways and amphitheatres nationwideABANDONEDJul 17, 1972

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 22, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 23, 1994ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 23, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 23, 1994EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 6, 1994CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 18, 1993PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 27, 1993PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Aug 26, 1993PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED—
Aug 26, 1993PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED—
Mar 8, 1993PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 1992ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 24, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 25, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 1991UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance