USPTO serial 74131055
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott A. Ferris, P.A.
SCOTT A FERRIS, PA10720 CARIBBEAN BLVDSTE 230MIAMI, FL 33189| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | patron services, i.e. security, crowd control, ticket takers and ushers, at various sporting and entertainment events or productions held at arenas, convention centers, stadiums, speedways and amphitheatres nationwide | ABANDONED | Jul 17, 1972 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 23, 1994 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 23, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 23, 1994 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 6, 1994 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1993 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 1993 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 26, 1993 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Aug 26, 1993 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Mar 8, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 25, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 1991 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |