USPTO serial 74131090
MODULAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SZOKE, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MODULAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ms. Sue Z. Shaper
MS SUE Z SHAPER PRAVEL, GAMBRELL, HEWITT, ET AL1177 W LOOP S 10TH FLHOUSTON, TX 77027UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | prosthetic hip implants and related instruments, said instruments including tools for femoral preparation and prothesis trialing, such as femoral broaches, trial neck and trial heads, collar viewing template, and driving slot and stem driver tip | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 27, 1992 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 1991 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jul 12, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |