USPTO serial 74132540
SPACE PLANES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPACE PLANES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vallejo, CA
Venice, CA
Venice, CA
Vallejo, CA
Venice, CA
Venice, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William David Kiesel
WILLIAM DAVID KIESEL ROY, KIESEL, AARON & TUCKERP O BOX 15928BATON ROUGE, LA 70895UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | modular storage system comprised principally of wood, but having plastic laminate or fabric inserts and paper honey-combed composite panels, of standardized size and design that can be fitted together in a variety of ways | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bragg, Lawrence T.
- Other trademarks owned by Panas, Gary M.
- Other trademarks owned by Panas, Gary M.
- Other trademarks owned by Bragg, Lawrence T.
- Other trademarks owned by Kitterman, Christopher L. R.
- Other trademarks owned by Kitterman, Christopher L. R.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named SPACE PLANES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 1993 | EX2M | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1993 | EX2D | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Aug 5, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 4, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 12, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 31, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |