Drawing for PRECISION AUTOMATION

USPTO serial 74134723

PRECISION AUTOMATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FINE, STEVEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRECISION AUTOMATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles F. Duffield

CHARLES F DUFFIELDSTE 218409 RTE 70 ECHERRY HILL, NJ 08034

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007special automated machines for packaging; machines for drilling, forming, cutting and inspection of metal parts and castings; metal piercing and notching machines; conveyors and equipment for transferring materials and parts between fabricating, manufacturing and warehouse operations; electronic control equipment for machinery and conveyor controlABANDONEDJul 1, 1974

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 1993ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 26, 1993EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 16, 1992EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Apr 29, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 19, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 28, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance