USPTO serial 74135547
STEALTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STEALTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAY LUKOWSKI, ESQ
JAY LUKOWSKI ESQ FEDER KASZOVITZ ISAACSON WEBER ET AL750 LEXINGTON AVE FL 23NEW YORK, NY 10022-1200UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | writing instruments, namely, pens, pencils, and markers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |