USPTO serial 74135691
FOUQUET'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FOUQUET'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARSHA G GENTNER
MARSHA G GENTNER JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NW 6TH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | stationery; notecards; playing cards; posters; printing blocks; paper bags; plastic sandwich bags; plastic bags for food storage; plastic bags for wrapping gifts; wrapper paper; facial tissues | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | educational services, namely, conducting classes and seminars in the field of gastronomy, culinary arts, hotel and restaurant management; book and magazine publication services; radio, television, and motion picture production services; entertainment services, namely, production of award ceremonies in the fields of literature, cinema, applied arts, fine arts, architecture and gastronomy; entertainment and educational services, namely, ceremonies and exhibitions in connection with the recognition of distinguished achievement in the fields of literature, cinema, applied arts, fine arts, architecture and gastronomy | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | ice cream parlor services; preparation of preserved, vacuum-packed or deep-frozen meals for catering establishments or private parties; preparations of pork and butcher's meat for catering establishments and private parties; bar services; hotel, restaurant, cafe and tearoom services; take out restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Le Fouquet's
- Other trademarks owned by Societe D'Exploitation De La Marque Le Fouquets
- Other trademarks owned by LE FOUQUETS S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Societe D'Exploitation De La Marque Le Fouquet's
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FOUQUET'S
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 2, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 4, 2006 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 4, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |