USPTO serial 74136217
STUNT GEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STUNT GEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
I. Morley Drucker
I MORLEY DRUCKER DRUCKER & SOMMERS9465 WILSHIRE BLVDSTE 328BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing for children; namely, pants, polo shirts, sweatshirts, T-shirts, jackets, gloves, hats, caps, belts, shoes, jumpsuits, and sweaters | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 29, 1994 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 6, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 1992 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 15, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 29, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |