USPTO serial 74136476
TURBO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TURBO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Milford, IN
Milford, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CYNTHIA A BUSHNELL
CYNTHIA A BUSHNELL TREXLER BUSHNELL GIANGIORGI & BLACKSTONE105 W ADAMS STE 3600CHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | ventilation systems for poultry and livestock houses comprising electric blowers, ducts and controls therefor | ACTIVE | Sep 20, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 16, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 9, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 26, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1996 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 1996 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 8, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 10, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 4, 1994 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 7, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |