USPTO serial 74136561
THE NORTH AMERICAN VETERINARY CONFERENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1717267Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 15, 1992
- Examiner
- BRUN, JEAN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE NORTH AMERICAN VETERINARY CONFERENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ralph H. Lane
RICHARD J MCKENNA FOLEY & LARDNER777 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services; namely, organizing, promoting, and conducting seminars, conferences, and lectures in the field of veterinary medicine | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 11, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Eastern States Veterinary Association, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Eastern States Veterinary Association, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named THE NORTH AMERICAN VETERINARY CONFERENCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 26, 2002 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 23, 2002 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 1999 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 15, 1998 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1992 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 17, 1992 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 30, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 26, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 9, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |