USPTO serial 74136628
PEPITO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PEPITO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Miami Lakes, FL
Miami Lakes, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jack E. Dominik
JACK E DOMINIK DOMINIK, STEIN, SACCOCIO, REESE, ET ALSTE 225, MIAMI LAKES CORPORATE PLZ6175 N W 153RD STMIAMI LAKES, FL 33014Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | prerecorded video tapes, motion picture films, and video discs, all featuring comic strip characters in animated form | ABANDONED | — |
| 014 | watches, jewelry, and pendants | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | greeting cards, posters, printed comic strips, and transfers for ironing on to articles of wearing apparel | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | T-shirts, caps, and sweatshirts | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PEPITO, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PEPITO, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named PEPITO
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 5, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 1997 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 12, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 7, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |