USPTO serial 74136763
ACCENTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREHELY, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ACCENTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Scarborough, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth M Garrett
1033 BAY STSTE 308TORONTO, ON M5S 3A5Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Christmas decorations and trimmings, namely, Christmas tree ornaments, tinsel, garlands, Draped Christmas tree ornaments in the nature of linked beads, tinsels or angel hair, tree skirts, icicles, angel hair, artificial Christmas trees and wreaths, spray can snow, Christmas stockings and Christmas tree decorations, namely, decorative bows and ribbons | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 7, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 26, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |