Drawing for DOUBLE GALV

USPTO serial 74137131

DOUBLE GALV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALT, JILL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOUBLE GALV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE REZAC & SCHWAB708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-4141UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006wire and wire products; namely, wire mesh, reinforcing mesh, chain link netting, hexagonal wire netting, aviary mesh, security fencing, panel fencing, pool fencing, opossum cages, boundary fencing, barbed wire, wool bale clips, fence droppers, field fence, deer fence and wire mesh for farm, industrial and household uses; and fencing wireABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 1993ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 8, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 14, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 16, 1991ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 13, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 12, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance