USPTO serial 74138875
JU CHAI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 4, 1994
- Examiner
- WHITAKER, LAURIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with JU CHAI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hsin Chuang City, Taipei Hsien, TW
Hsin Chuang City, Taipei Hsien, TW
Hsin Chuang City, Taipei Hsien, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheridan Neimark
SHERIDAN NEIMARK BROWDY AND NEIMARKSTE 300419 SEVENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | scallop cakes made with soy; pork and meat substitutes made with soy; fish ball substitutes made with soy and mushrooms; coated meat substitutes from soy; vegetable balls made of soy; soy cakes; pre-mixed packaged food made from flour and soy; namely, smoked pork with spices and vegetables, fish balls, meat coated with fish breading and mushroom fish balls and vegetarian meat substitutes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 28, 1992 |
| 030 | soy sauce; food products made from flour and soy; namely, Chinese buns; dough; bakery goods; dumplings; won tons; egg rolls; chow mein noodle; pre-mixed packaged food made from flour and soy; namely, fresh cheese buns, cakes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 28, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JU CHAI CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by JU CHAI CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by JU CHAI CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named JU CHAI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 4, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 6, 1993 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 28, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 16, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 1, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 1, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |