USPTO serial 74139047
MAGENTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, MARGARET
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAGENTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James C. Scheller
JAMES C SCHELLER BLAKELY, SOKOLOFF, TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVDSEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware; computer workstation comprising computer monitors, disk drives, keyboards, and mice; and related computer peripherals | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 1993 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 9, 1993 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 9, 1993 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 11, 1993 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 24, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 25, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |