USPTO serial 74139185
NORTH AMERICAN DEER FARMERS ASSOCIATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1697226Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 23, 1992
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NORTH AMERICAN DEER FARMERS ASSOCIATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul C. Van Slyke
PAUL C. VAN SLYKE LOCKE LIDDELL & SAPP PLLCATTN: IP DOCKET CLERK600 TRAVIS,. SUITE 3400HOUSTON, TX 77002-3095Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 200 | indicating membership in a deer farmers' association | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 31, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NORTH AMERICAN DEER FARMERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NORTH AMERICAN DEER FARMERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 200
- Similar marks named NORTH AMERICAN DEER FARMERS ASSOCIATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 16, 2002 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 20, 2002 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 1997 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 10, 1997 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1992 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 6, 1992 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 5, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 6, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |