Drawing for EARTHKEEPING

USPTO serial 74139244

EARTHKEEPING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EARTHKEEPING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037restoration services; namely, restoring ecologically-damaged sitesABANDONED—
041restoration services; namely, restoring ecologically-damaged sites through a cooperative effort of the society for ecological restoration, the scientific community, and local residents of the areas being restoredABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 1993ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Mar 9, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 5, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 6, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 30, 1992CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 30, 1992ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 8, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 25, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 2, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance