Drawing for BON TEMPS BURGER

USPTO serial 74140021

BON TEMPS BURGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRIEDMAN, HOWARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BON TEMPS BURGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HENRY W. LEEDS

HENRY W LEEDS TUCKER, FLYER & LEWISSTE 4001615 L ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030hamburger sandwich for consumption on or off the premisesABANDONEDNov 1, 1983

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 1995ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 17, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 3, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 26, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 31, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 1992REINREINSTATED—
May 21, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 1992ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 28, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance