USPTO serial 74140026
SMALL LUXURY HOTELS OF THE WORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2086681Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 12, 1997
- Examiner
- KREHELY, KIM
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMALL LUXURY HOTELS OF THE WORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Small Luxury Hotels of the World Ltd.
Leatherhead, GB
Other trademarks owned by Small Luxury Hotels of the World Ltd.
Small Luxury Hotels of the World Ltd.
London SW15 2NU, GB
Other trademarks owned by Small Luxury Hotels of the World Ltd.
Small Luxury Hotels of the World Ltd.
London SW15 2NU, GB
Other trademarks owned by Small Luxury Hotels of the World Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jacqueline P. Scheib
Jacqueline P. Scheib Robinson & Cole LLP280 Trumbull StreetHartford, CT 06103UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Small Luxury Hotels of the World Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Small Luxury Hotels of the World Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Small Luxury Hotels of the World Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SMALL LUXURY HOTELS OF THE WORLD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 30, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 16, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2003 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 20, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Sep 18, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 27, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 2, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |