Drawing for FALCON

USPTO serial 74140093

FALCON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 608
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FALCON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William A. Troner

WILLIAM A TRONER HARRIS CORPORATION1025 W NASA BLVDMELBOURNE, FL 32919UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009high frequency radio transceivers for communication of voice, data, images and faxes, and parts thereforABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 1999PR.WPETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN—
May 27, 1999PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 28, 1999PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 1999PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 1998ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 27, 1998UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 1998SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 25, 1997IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 29, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 6, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 21, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 6, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 19, 1991CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 8, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance