USPTO serial 74140500
EPINGLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EPINGLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil A. Smith
NEIL A SMITH LIMBACH & LIMBACH2001 FERRY BLDGSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4262UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemicals for use in the manufacture of insect growth regulators and of insecticides or pesticides | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | insect growth regulators, insecticides, pesticides and preparations for destroying vermin; all for agricultural use, domestic use or for prevention of epidemics | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SUMITOMO CHEMICAL CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SUMITOMO CHEMICAL CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named EPINGLE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 24, 1995 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 1995 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 1994 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 1994 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 7, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |