USPTO serial 74140827
SPOSA 2000
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPOSA 2000?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth M. Garrett
KENNETH M GARRETT1033 BAY STSTE 308TORONTO, ON M5S 3A5Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing namely dresses, gowns, skirts, blouses, pants, jackets, suits, tuxedos, shirts, scarves, shawls, stoles, mufflers sashes, stockings, gloves, ties, ascots, cummerbunds, dickies, belts for clothing, bow ties, handkerchiefs, cravats, suspenders, socks, veils and hats; shoes and slippers; undergarment wearing apparel namely briefs, t-shirts, slips, panties, teddies, garters, camisoles, boxer shorts, corsets, petticoats, and brassieres sleepwear namely pyjamas, lounging pyjamas, nightgowns, bathrobes, lounging robes and peignoirs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1991 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |