Drawing for VITAFRUT

USPTO serial 74141106

VITAFRUT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1843110Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 5, 1994
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VITAFRUT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John P. Moran

WILLIAM F HERBERT STAAS & HALSEY LLP1201 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032soft drinks, syrups and concentrates used in the preparation of soft drinksSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2014NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Dec 23, 2013NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Dec 19, 2013NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Feb 27, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 1999CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 21, 1999C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Aug 25, 1999CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Apr 6, 1999PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 5, 1994R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 18, 1994REINREINSTATED—
Sep 10, 1993ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 9, 1993IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Mar 9, 1993NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 15, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 14, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 21, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 25, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 24, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 27, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance