Drawing for TROUBLE-FREE

USPTO serial 74141290

TROUBLE-FREE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLE RICHARD G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TROUBLE-FREE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Simor L. Moskowitz

SIMOR L MOSKOWITZ FLEIT, JACOBSON, COHN, PRICE, ET ALTHE JENIFER BLDG400 SEVENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007automotive parts; namely, distributors, and caps and rotors for distributorsABANDONED—
008hand tools for use in repairing or servicing automobiles; namely, drive sockets, ratchet/socket screwdriver sets, racheting box wrenches, screwdrivers, wrenches, ratchet wrenchesABANDONED—
009automotive tune up kits, principally comprising timing lights in the nature of calibrated apparatuses for use in automobile tune-up applicationsABANDONED—
011air conditioner and/or heater blower motors for automobilesABANDONED—
012automobile parts; namely, clutches, fuel pumps, master cylinders, power steering units, brake calipers, wiper motors, smog pumps, timing sets comprising timing chain; cam gear and crank gear, oil filters, air filters, PCV valves, breather elements, and fuel filtersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 3, 1996ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 30, 1995EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 2, 1995EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 20, 1995EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 2, 1995EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 18, 1994EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 15, 1994DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 1, 1994EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 1, 1994EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 1994DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 1994EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 14, 1993EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 2, 1993EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 2, 1993NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 8, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 6, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 14, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 4, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 7, 1992UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 18, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance