USPTO serial 74141297
HABITANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HABITANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James K. Baughman
JAMES K BAUGHMAN LEGAL DEPTC/O CAMPBELL PLCAMDEN, NJ 08103-1799UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | soups, pickles, processed onions, olive oil, processed olives, jams, jellies, marmalade, maraschino cherries, fruit-based pie fillings, fruit and nut toppings, dairy or non-dairy whipped toppings, apple and cranberry sauces. | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | table syrup, catsup, custard- and chocolate-based pie fillings, chocolate and marshmallow toppings, butterscotch toppings caramel toppings, mustard, sauces (excluding apple and cranberry sauce), vinegar, capers, relishes, horseradish | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |