USPTO serial 74141791
SDM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1786510Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 10, 1993
- Examiner
- SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SDM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nanette D. Truelove
NANETTE D TRUELOVE SDM INTERNATIONAL INC134 SPRING AVEFUQUAY-VARINA, NC 27526UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in the fields of electronic funds transfer (EFT), electronic data interchange (EDI), system integration and telecommunications | EXPIRED | Apr 14, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 31, 2007 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 1999 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 26, 1999 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 18, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 17, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 1993 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 1992 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |