USPTO serial 74141891
PREMIER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAVONESE, DANIEL P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PREMIER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James L. Kurtz
JAMES L KURTZ KINZER, PLYER, DORN, MCEACHRAN, ET AL55 E MONROE ST STE 2940CHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 10, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 10, 1997 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 29, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 7, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |