USPTO serial 74142101
MAXIMUM IMPACT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 21, 1993
- Examiner
- JUDGE, CONNIE M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAXIMUM IMPACT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
IMPACT TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.
Charlotte, NC
IMPACT TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.
Charlotte, NC
IMPACT TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.
Charlotte, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW P. TENNENT
ANDREW P TENNENT1515 MOCKINGBIRD LN STE 410CHARLOTTE, NC 28209UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IMPACT TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by IMPACT TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by IMPACT TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named MAXIMUM IMPACT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2000 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 21, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 28, 1993 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 14, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 14, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |