USPTO serial 74142355
HAMILTON'S TAVERN HAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLUE, RACHEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HAMILTON'S TAVERN HAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberly S. Lebar
KIMBERLY S LEBAR MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHEONE JAMES CTRRICHMOND, VA 23219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | hams | ABANDONED | May 20, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Smithfield Packing Company, Incorporated, The
- Other trademarks owned by Smithfield Packing Company, Incorporated, The
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named HAMILTON'S TAVERN HAM
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 1, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 20, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 16, 1992 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 3, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 10, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 31, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |