Drawing for HYPERBARIC FILTER

USPTO serial 74143189

HYPERBARIC FILTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JEFFRIES, STEPHEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYPERBARIC FILTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David S. Abrams

DAVID S ABRAMS ROYLANCE, ABRAMS BERDO & GOODMAN1225 CONNECTICUT AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007dewatering and separating apparatus for use in liquid/solid separation of slurries containing for example raw ores, minerals, concentrates and metals and other ultra fine materialsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 1993ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 8, 1993EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 8, 1993EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 9, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 24, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 1991ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 17, 1991CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 11, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance