Drawing for BECAUSE AT SEBASTIAN, IT'S MORE THAN HOW YOU LOOK

USPTO serial 74143622

BECAUSE AT SEBASTIAN, IT'S MORE THAN HOW YOU LOOK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FALK, ERIN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BECAUSE AT SEBASTIAN, IT'S MORE THAN HOW YOU LOOK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donna A. Rubelman

DONNA A RUBELMAN SPENSLEY HORN JUBAS & LUBITZ5TH FL1880 CENTURY PARK ELOS ANGELES, CA 90067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cuticle removing preparations, nonmedicated hair and skin care preparations; namely, shampoo, conditioners, hairsprays, hair styling creams, gels and lotions, hair waiving lotion, hair bleaching preparations, hair conditioners, hair straightening preparations, hair styling preparations, skin cleansing lotions and creams, skin toners, skin emollients, skin cream, skin moisturizers, skin cleaning oils, perfumes, colognes, and shaving lotion, foundation makeup, blush, hand and body lotion, lipstick, eyebrow pencils, mascara, eyeshadowABANDONED—
021non-metal piggy banksABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 1993ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 29, 1992NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 6, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 4, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 22, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 16, 1992CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 19, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 3, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance