USPTO serial 74143682
SURGEPLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SURGEPLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph S. Littenberg
JOSEPH S LITTENBERG LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, ET AL600 S AVE WWESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | retail consumer electronic accessories; namely, electrical receptacles featuring filters for protecting against uneven line voltages and static sold to household and office users | ABANDONED | Jun 15, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 22, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 5, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 4, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1991 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 21, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 1991 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 1991 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 8, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |