USPTO serial 74144196
VELVET TOUCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, LAURA E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VELVET TOUCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Esler
MICHAEL J ESLER ESLER, STEPHENS & BUCKLEYONE MAIN PL STE 1870101 S W MAIN STPORTLAND, OR 97204-3226Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | medical equipment; namely, vacuum delivery apparatus, pumps, and cups, and parts therefor for use in infant delivery and medical applications | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Smith, Larry and Smith, Emily
- Other trademarks owned by Smith, Emily
- Other trademarks owned by Smith, Emily
- Other trademarks owned by Smith, Larry
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named VELVET TOUCH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 1994 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Dec 2, 1993 | EX3M | SOU EXTENSION 3 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1993 | EX3D | SOU EXTENSION 3 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Sep 4, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 3, 1993 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 10, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 8, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |