USPTO serial 74144198
CHARQUI BRAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILSON, ANGELA BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHARQUI BRAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie Bertagnolli
LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI BAKER & MCKENZIEONE PRUDENTIAL PLZ130 E RANDOLPH DRCHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | beef jerky (chopped and formed, natural style) beef steak jerky, beef snuff (consisting of beef jerky shredded very finely to resemble powdered tobacco), beef sausage, beef stick, summer sausage, buendnerfleisch (consisting of airdried, cured beef covered with a thin crust of spices), jerked meat, namely, beef, lamb, mutton and pork, chicken jerky, turkey jerky, machaca (consisting of cured beef or beef jerky shredded semi-fine and used as an ingredient in Mexican cooking), pastrami, pastroma (consisting of meat cured with salt and covered with a thin layer of oriental spices), tasajo, aporreado de tasajo (consisting of desalted tasajo shredded into long strands), corned beef, corned beef hash, corned lamb and mutton, roast stew, luncheon meat, cubed beef, beef extract, frankfurters and vienna sausages | ABANDONED | Jul 15, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 1994 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 5, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 2, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 1992 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 22, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 17, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |